Publication
La Cour suprême du Canada tranche : les cadres ne pourront se syndiquer au Québec
Le 19 avril dernier, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu une décision fort attendue en matière de syndicalisation des cadres.
Mondial | Publication | September, 2015
The Copyright Amendment Bill, published on 27 July 2015, has been lauded by some stakeholders as being progressive, whilst others view it as absurd and abysmal.
The Bill seeks to modernise the Copyright Act, 1978 to bring it in line with technological advances, but the formulation of the Bill has left more questions than answers. The purpose of this write-up is to provide an overview of some of the radical changes proposed.
The Bill has introduced a new class of works eligible for copyright, namely “craft works” and “phonograms”. The anomaly is that both works are already catered for in the Copyright Act. Craft works is covered under works of craftsmanship and phonograms are covered under the current definition of sound recordings.
The Bill introduces a right for creators of artistic works to claim a 5% royalty on the commercial resale of their work. This is available if the creator is a citizen or resident of South Africa, the resale occurs in South Africa, and the term of the resale right has not expired. This right cannot be waived or transferred. Whilst this is a commendable amendment, one cannot help but wonder how it is going to be implemented in practice.
The Bill provides that despite the transfer of copyright the owner, creator or author retains the right to claim a royalty when the work of copyright is used. Of all of the amendments which are sought to be introduced by the Bill, this is the most troubling. It is not clear how and why the creator, owner or author of copyright could, or should, be entitled to royalties after they have divested themselves of the copyright.
The Bill proposes that parallel importation of trade-marked goods will be permitted. Brand owners will therefore no longer be able to utilise the Copyright Act to restrict parallel imports.
The Bill requires the broadcasting industry to develop local content by, amongst others things, broadcasting 80% of local content on public channels and 60% of local content on private channels. What is more, the Bill seeks to criminalise the failure to meet the local content criteria. This, in our view, is completely unworkable and absurd.
New offences The Bill proposes a number of new criminal offences that could result in up to 10 years’ imprisonment and/or a fine not exceeding R50000.00 on conviction. These include:
The Bill proposes the establishment of an Intellectual Property Tribunal which will replace the Copyright Tribunal. It contains extensive provisions on the composition of the Tribunal and its powers. The persons who will be appointed to the Tribunal will include persons holding qualifications in economics, commerce or public affairs.
The Bill seeks to make directors, company secretaries and similar office bearers liable and guilty if contraventions of copyright are committed by a juristic person, unless they are able to demonstrate that the contraventions were committed without their knowledge, or that they exercised due diligence to prevent the commission of such offences.
the Bill introduces new instances where copyright will vest in the state:
the right to assign copyright has been restricted to 25 years. Therefore all assignment agreements will be valid for 25 years after which the copyright will revert to the owner or author of the copyright.
For the reasons set out above the Bill, as currently worded, has created more questions than answers. One can only hope that the grave shortcomings are ironed out before it is passed into law.
Publication
Le 19 avril dernier, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu une décision fort attendue en matière de syndicalisation des cadres.
Publication
Le budget 2024 propose d’élargir la portée de certains pouvoirs permettant à l’ARC de demander des renseignements aux contribuables tout en prévoyant de nouvelles conséquences pour les contribuables contrevenants.
Publication
L'impôt minimum de remplacement (IMR) est un impôt sur le revenu additionnel prévu dans la Loi de l’impôt sur le revenu (Canada) (la « Loi ») auquel sont assujettis les particuliers et certaines fiducies qui pourraient autrement avoir recours à certaines déductions et exemptions et à certains crédits pour réduire leur impôt sur le revenu fédéral canadien régulier.
Abonnez-vous et restez à l’affût des nouvelles juridiques, informations et événements les plus récents...
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023